Can McDonald’s Prevent The Next World War?

Before you say anything, give me a chance to explain.

The approach in our blog title does not belong to me. The origin of the idea comes from New York Times writer Thomas Friedman. His “Foreign Affairs Big Mac I” article has a cynical approach that I would like to discuss.

Friedman’s argument goes like this:

No two countries that both had McDonald’s had fought a war against each other since each got its McDonald’s.

The meaning narrows down a lot when I look at the situation from this point of view, I know.

This claim later became widely used in other books of the author under the “Golden Arches Theory of Conflict Prevention” approach. The basic assumption behind the insight is related to globalization and economic development. If countries have a middle class strong enough to support the McDonald’s franchise system, this insight assumes that those countries will not be interested in war. The author calls these countries “Mcdonald’s countries”claims that governments have more to lose by going into battle.

I would like to state that this thesis still stands despite a few exceptions. There is a big trend about globalization that everyone should be aware of. A “middle class” is rising worldwide with similar consumption habits and doing similar jobs. I’m talking about the “qualified” middle class who watch Netflix, go to Starbucks, eat McDonald’s, follow the world on Twitter. Understanding this class and solving its needs are the marketing problems of the future. (Subject for another article)

When we look at the general characteristics of the middle class, we see a more educated, more technically equipped mass. They are open to the global world, can choose different countries for vacation, are distant from nationalism and religion, and far from ideologies — arguably the most valuable workforce for countries. We are talking about people who produce economic value and develop the country.